🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.